The FAT32 or NTFS format does not matter, it is important to extract on the PC in safe mode, there are those who have some USB devices with deficiencies and they must be discarded for use in the STB
The FAT32 or NTFS format does not matter, it is important to extract on the PC in safe mode, there are those who have some USB devices with deficiencies and they must be discarded for use in the STB
thanks but too hard for me, I only tried the GT 7 Pro on the TV ,,,
anyway who wants it I give it
...devo dire la verità.... dopo il v7 pro e il v8 turbo....MAI più GTMEDIA!!!
buon hardware ma firmware fatto col culo....
Devi mantenere una buona lingua in tutti i messaggi, la frase che ha fatto su come è stato realizzato il firmware è impropria rispetto a chi l'ha progettato
@ mazzuk
What issues do you have with the said receivers, i use both, they are good receivers for what I REQUIRE them for.
Until we know of what your issues are about, we will not be able to help.
...devo dire la verità.... dopo il v7 pro e il v8 turbo....MAI più GTMEDIA!!!
buon hardware ma firmware fatto col culo....
Devi mantenere una buona lingua in tutti i messaggi, la frase che ha fatto su come è stato realizzato il firmware è impropria rispetto a chi l'ha progettato
you're probably right, I'm sorry .... but they took my money anyway ....
I also believe I reflect the various opinions I see on the forums I attend....
regards
@ mazzuk
What issues do you have with the said receivers, i use both, they are good receivers for what I REQUIRE them for.
Until we know of what your issues are about, we will not be able to help.
Den
The problems are mainly on the numbering of the channels ..... now leaving out various precautions that sometimes on some receivers work and on others not, it does not seem impossible to create a firmware that works normally like almost all other manufacturers... or no?
Gt creates numerous decoders in a short time and all full of bugs .... does it seem right? and the criticisms must be received to improve ... for example the v8 turbo in the DTT numbering has the same bug in every firmware .... i.e. wrong numbering and channels with the same number
Is it just the (DTT) side of both receivers that you have issue with.
When you carry out a scan of the frequencies, in your area, do you have the (LCN) set to (ON).
So when the scan is complete, what is missing, (if it is anything like here in the UK, the software does not take into account the blank slots for any updates ), have you got a list, that you can link us too, to compare what the receiver does to what is the correct (DTT) for area.
If you can give screen shots, it would help.